European Civil Society meets to plan the Year Ahead
At the EURODAD Conference
EURODAD (European Network on Debt and
Development) (of which nef is a member) held its AGM
and annual conference in Dublin
from 30th November to 2nd December 2005. The latter was attended by
about 132 people from 32 countries and was on the theme “Global Decision-Making
And National Realities: Where Next On Aid And Debt?”. It
is the main forum for deciding strategy for the coming year for campaigners
from all over Europe. A number of observers
from the South ensured that the conference was (?) kept in touch with opinion
in that quarter.
Steve Mandel, our Senior Researcher,
attended both AGM and conference
on behalf of nef and Jubilee Research.
The AGM discussion
focussed on the outline work plan for Eurodad staff for the next three years
and the detailed plans for the coming year, as well as the usual stuff of an
AGM, such as the election of new board members, the annual accounts and the
budget. There were two new members of the Board, namely Sony
Kapoor of Christian Aid and Jurgen Kaiser of Erlassjahr
(Jubilee Germany). Plans for expansion, particularly to include the new members
of the EU and greater representation in southern Europe,
were discussed. Three new members were accepted into Eurodad: Both Ends of the Netherlands, Centre National de Coopération au Développement (CNCD) of Belgium and
ATTAC (Association pour la Taxation des Transactions pour l’Aide aux Citoyens) of
Sweden.
Discussion in the first main session of the
conference focussed on a review of
the value of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP)
currently favoured by the WB. These are supposed to be national plans which entail
much improved consultation and involvement of civil society in the planning of
a country’s development (and hence also in WB and other donor’s programmes).
The subject has been studied by EURODAD using case studies in four countries
and their report concluded that very few civil society organisations had even
heard of the process, let alone been consulted and that the PRSPs had examined
only minor mitigating variations, not major policy options and so could not be
regarded as living up to their name. The second main session looked at
campaigning issues and was striking for the agreement that while trade, aid and
debt are the immediate themes on which people campaign,
the real issues are equity, justice, power and legitimacy and the need for a
revised world economic order, which are not often referred to directly.
Another prominent theme was the importance
of turning the focus of campaigning towards the illegitimacy of many debts,
following the landmark acceptance by the Norwegian govt that odious debt should
be cancelled.
Steve ran a workshop entitled “The Big
Picture” and circulated a work-in-progress paper entitled “A Human Development
Approach to Debt Relief”. The former was aimed to get people thinking about the
interconnections between all the elements of the international economic system,
with the aim of substituting the pursuit of sustainable well-being for the
chimera of eternal growth in wealth. The latter reworked and extended a study
carried out by CAFOD into how the concept of debt sustainability could be given
a human face by ensuring that governments were not forced to put debt servicing
before the minimal standard of living for their people. For
the full text see …..
During the conference itself work was
carried out on a letter of protest to the UK
and other governments about to receive $12.4 billion over the next 6 months from
Nigeria
to clear its Paris Club debts. This debt consists almost entirely of export
credit guarantee debt, contracted under military dictatorships often by dubious
firms associated with the regime and for exports from Britain that were
guaranteed by the ECGD often without proper scrutiny. For the UK to receive
twice as much (£1.7 billion) in 6 months from a country where more than 80
million of its inhabitants live on less than $1 a day and one in five children
do not reach their fifth birthday than it is giving to all African countries
put together in 2005 is clearly obscene.
Delegates left feeling inspired by the
enthusiasm, energy and imagination of the participants and with plenty of ideas
for the coming year. Once again, despite differences of opinion about the
detail, the unanimity about the main goals and the determination to work
together, to find the common ground and move forward was striking.